
Is the America’s Cup Being Run Illegally?
Bay Area sailor and recent Three Bridge Fiasco winner John Sweeney recently posted his view on the current iteration of the America’s Cup on yacht designer Julian Everett’s Facebook page. Sweeney speaks his mind:
The America’s Cup is not merely a sport in decline. It is operating outside the Deed of Gift that governs its existence.
Since the demise of the International America’s Cup Class (IACC) at the 2007 Valencia regatta, the Cup has careened into a high-speed, foiling spectacle. Some celebrate it. Most sailors do not. But aesthetics and nostalgia are not the real problem.
The real problem is legal: The current holder of the America’s Cup is running the event in material violation of the Deed of Gift, and the New York courts — the only courts with jurisdiction — have a duty to intervene.
I intend to ask them to do exactly that.
THE DEED OF GIFT IS NOT OPTIONAL
The America’s Cup is not owned by a federation, a commercial rights holder, or a media company. It is governed by a trust instrument — the Deed of Gift — enforced for more than 170 years by the New York courts.
It has been modified before. But it has never been abandoned.
Among its core requirements are:
• Racing in yachts that comply with specified waterline limits
• Racing without stored power or engines
• Racing on a windward–leeward or triangular course
• Racing on an arm of the sea within a defined distance of the winning club’s location
• Yachts propelled solely by sailors
Today’s foiling craft fail these requirements on multiple levels.
I will not disclose every element of my legal action here. But one fact is undeniable: Foiling yachts do not comply with the minimum racing waterline requirements as clarified by New York courts, nor do they comply with the Deed’s prohibition on stored and assisted power.
Flying above the water is not “sailing” as contemplated by the trust.
WHO I AM – AND WHY THIS MATTERS
I am not a casual critic.
I trimmed the main on America True and Oracle BMW Racing. I later funded my own campaign — the Sausalito Challenge — for the 2007 cycle, which ultimately evolved into Shosholoza. From 1999 to 2007, my partner Tina and I purchased and restored four IACC yachts and ran a vintage challenge series out of the Sausalito Yacht Club.
That series attracted serious teams. Larry Ellison joined with USA-61 and USA-76. The momentum ended when Alinghi and Oracle shifted focus to the commercial Moët Cup concept.
I have spent my life inside the America’s Cup ecosystem — as a sailor, a syndicate founder, and a steward of its history.
This is not theory. It is lived experience.

WHAT THE CUP WAS MEANT TO BE
The original America’s Cup envisioned large, demanding monohulls — closer in spirit to the J-Class than to aircraft. Yachts sailed by crews of 25–30. No engines. No batteries. No flight control systems.
Just sailors.
Racing was meant to be grueling. Tactical. Human. Conducted on recognizable courses that rewarded seamanship and endurance.
Today, the Cup is sailed by pilots managing systems — not crews sailing boats.
Speed alone is not the violation. Structure is.
THE LEGAL LINE THAT WAS CROSSED
The most direct violation — and the one that brings the event squarely back under New York jurisdiction — concerns racing waterline length.
Foiling yachts circumvent waterline limits by removing displacement from the equation entirely. The New York courts have already spoken on minimum waterline standards in prior Deed litigation.
Foiling did not amend those rulings. Marketing did not amend the trust. Commercial success does not supersede law.
Additionally:
• Races are not held on Deed-compliant courses
• Stored energy systems assist control and propulsion
• The competition is effectively sold and rewritten by the defender
That is not how trusts work.
THE SOLUTION: A MODERN, DEED-COMPLIANT CLASS
My petition will not merely challenge. It will propose.
I will ask the court to enforce a 90-ft maximum waterline monohull class, sailed by approximately 30 crew, with:
• No engines
• No stored power
• No assisted control systems
• Deed-compliant courses
• Racing held within a 50-mile radius of the winning club
Not retro. Not nostalgic. Modern — but lawful.
A class that blends the majesty of J-Class with the discipline of IACC. Aluminum or alloy behemoths. Brutal. Punishing. Spectacular in a way that sailing is meant to be.
“TEAM NEW ZEALAND DOESN’T WANT THAT”
That argument fails historically.
In 2007, I was the chosen Challenger of Record contingent upon Team New Zealand’s winning the Cup. My lawyer and I were present to execute the agreement. Together, we developed a 90-ft waterline concept — precisely the hybrid class now being ignored.
What changed wasn’t feasibility.
It was commercialization.
A FINAL WORD
The New York Yacht Club has a responsibility here. Silence is acquiescence.
The America’s Cup does not belong to flying machines, sponsors, or television formats. It belongs to sailors — and to the law that created it.
Someone has to enforce that law.

Absolutely correct. I am a long term sailor at 78 and have watched this “evolution ” with horror and then distain. What those boats do is not sailing…it’s foiling. They can’t sail in super light air, then can’t sail in wind above, I believe, 18 knots. They are not only not within the Deed but the violate the spirit of sailing which is sailing through the water, not skimming above it. I am sure I am not the only person who use to look forward to the Cup races, and be glue to the TV watching them , who now ignores the entire scene. Good luck with the suit.
Thank you for your thoughts ! Totally agree !
Hear, hear, John!! However, in this day and age, where it’s capital, and corrupt insiders, uber alles, getting the NYYC to prosecute your well-reasoned complaint is about as likely as getting Pam Bondi to go after oranjboi for violating the Emoluments Clause.
I am fully in on this notion – Americas Cup sailing should be basic, monohull, no electronics sailing. Mostly up to the skill of the sailors. The multihull speed boats can exist, just not as “Americas Cup” boats. They can be their own group.
While the legalities mentioned may be correct, and I don’t dispute them, the old AC was boring. Slow.
The new foiling series is exciting, fast and above all entertaining.
And thus far appears also to be commercially viable, which the old version was not.
By all means pursue a legal challenge.
If you win, good luck with setting up a new version of the old style event.
It will no doubt go back to being a race between billionaires and even then not guaranteed any TV coverage or opportunity for revenue for the organiser.
If you win it may simply be a pyrrhic victory.
Nostalgic sailors will rejoice no doubt, but the rest of the world has already moved on.
Other classes of racing have adopted foils, and no doubt more will follow.
Bit the historic classic wooden J Class boats have a few races mainly in the Med, so nostalgia is also a potential attractor of eyeballs.
Good luck! You’re going to need it!